Bordeaux’s 2007 Wine of the Vintage (South African Wine News)
Thursday, April 17th, 2008After tasting hundreds of reds and whites the Wine Enthusiast Wine of the Vintage 2007 is Ch
After tasting hundreds of reds and whites the Wine Enthusiast Wine of the Vintage 2007 is Ch

Another new wine magazine has emerged of late and like the last new magazine I alerted you to, this one is also somewhat niche in nature.
Color and Aroma magazine is a very well designed, attractive publication that seeks to serve the CA wine drinker and wine lover. The a
ctual design reminds me of “Simple” magazine, but with more color and more drama. Being focused on the Southern
California region it is no surprise that the first issue (it’s published 6 times per year) digs into the Paso Robles wine region, spotlights Castoro Cellars, review a Southern California restaurant and a Southern California-based wine group. The advertising too gives away Color and Aroma’s regional focus.
I wouldn’t want to give anyone the idea that they need to live in Southern California to appreciate Color and Aroma. The writing is excellent. Any wine lover will appreciate the articles. The general articles offer inspiration and information for wine lovers no matter where they reside.
You hate to see a magazine launch without good advertising support. Color and Aroma appears to have this kind of support. My hope is that they can find a core of subscribers and good distribution that will allow them to continue to create a very nice publication by providing a good sized base of readers.
You can learn more about Color and Aroma HERE.
Original post by Tom Wark
It appears that shame has fallen upon me.
In response to this press release, issued two days ago on behalf of Specialty Wine Retailers Association and in conjunction with the 75th anniversary of Repeal of Prohibition, I received the following scolding:
"Your press release is an absolute travesty; I wonder how the members of your organization would feel if people outside your industry considered all of the retailers the same. I’m sure your stereotyping and fear-mongering seems more than justified in your eyes, but as a Sales Manager for a reputable wine wholesaler I take offense at being lumped in with everyone else. What people like you don′t understand is that not all consumers in the US are comfortable supporting causes or organizations that only see things in black or white; that paint everything with the same brush. You are no better than people running around saying "All politicians are corrupt scumbags" or "All professional athletes are rich, spoiled steroid junkies." Shame on you."
I would have sympathy for the pain this gentleman feels if he were actually willing to come out publicly, as a wholesaler, and break with the two decade old line the distributors have held: that direct shipping is bad for the public and will only lead to children dying from consuming Pinot Noir.
I’d have sympathy for this gentleman’s plight if he issued a statement saying, as a wholesaler I disagree with my industry’s cynical and self serving positions that serve only to line their pockets and screw consumers. I’ve been looking for just such a wholesaler for a very long time.
In fact, my response to this gentleman wholesalers was as follows:
"Tell me Sir, are you the wholesaler I’ve been looking for? Are you the one that will break from the party line. Because if you are, I’m willing to send out a press release nationwide, retract any sweeping statements I’ve made about wholesalers and demonstrate my mistake by noting that you, a Sales Manager at respected distributorship, are willing to support retailer to consumer shipping.
In fact, I suspect that next year there will be a bill in your state’s legislature that would create a permit for out of state retailers to ship to consumers. Would you be the wholesaler willing to testify in favor of it. Can you get the owner of your distributorship to put his firm on record as supporting retailer to consumer shipping?
You see, until I can find a wholesaler willing to actually prove me wrong, a wholesaler willing to stand up for consumers and support their ability to purchase wines that wholesalers will not bring into the state, then I think I’m on firm ground in painting with a very broad brush."
I’ve not yet received a response to my offer. However, the offer stands for ANY wholesaler: Come out against the cynical positions your state and national associations have taken for two decades and Specialty Wine Retailers Association will issue a press release withdrawing any sweeping statements it has made about the cynicism of wholesalers and their willingness to dismiss and disregard the consumers for the sake of their own bottom line.
I await the flood of wholesalers taking me up on my offer.
Original post by Tom Wark
Tisbury voters, it seems, are split on whether to allow restaurants in town to put beer and wine on the menu.
Original post by Tim

On Saturday, April 26, at Judd’s Hill winery the winery is holding their annual musical bonanza party, which benefits the Napa Valley Youth Symphony. The Bonanza begins at noon and will go until 4PM at Judd
Three years ago this week I was making my way around the top restaurants of Buenos Aires, ordering too much food, too much wine, and having a grand old time. I had come to Argentina, in addition to simply relax, to find out whether or not there was anything worth drinking made out of a grape called Malbec.
The answer, of course, was a resounding “yes!” I managed to figure out why some serious wine lovers (and critics alike) had begun to quietly suggest that Argentinean Malbec was going to be the Next Big Thing.
This wine was NOT one of the wines I discovered when I was bumping along the back roads of Mendoza. But after tasting it, I sure wish I had known that both sides of the Pulenta family were making such awesome wines.
Pulenta Estate (not to be confused with Bodega Carlos Pulenta, which is run by another set of Pulenta sons) embodies the continued dream of the Pulenta family which began three generations earlier, near the turn of the century.
Angelo Polenta (the “o″ later became a “u”) and Palma Spinsati, like thousands of others at that time, immigrated to Argentina from Italy in 1902. They settled in the broad farmlands that still occupy the alluvial plains of Mendoza, under the shadow of the snow-capped Andes Mountains. With the determination that embodies so much of the immigrant experience everywhere in the world, they began to scratch out an existence for themselves as they set down their roots.
By 1914, they had moved a bit farther north to the town of San Juan and had started a small winery and a very large family, one that would quickly grow to 8 children. Those 8 children went on to have their own children, while the family winery continued to prosper. From 1914 to 1997, the Pulenta family built a successful winery business that they eventually sold.
In 2001, a few years after the sale of their San Juan estate, Brothers Eduardo and Hugo purchased vineyard land not too far from where their family first began farming three generations earlier, and established Pulenta Estate Winery.
At 2900 feet above sea level, the estates 333 acres in the Lujan de Cuyo area of Mendoza typify the regions best managed vineyards. Densely planted, dry farmed vines imported from France and Italy are subject to some of the planet’s greatest temperature changes in the course of a day. This diurnal shift coupled with cool sunny days that typify the March harvest mean that properly tended grapes get to mature slowly and beautifully.
Like many producers in the area, the Pulenta estate produces three tiers of wine from their estate vineyards: a set of “Gran” reserve wines, a set of varietally labeled wines, and a set of “young release” wines that are marketed under the brand “La Flor.”
Their top tier of “great” wines contains three different bottlings: a Malbec, a Cabernet Franc, and this, their “corte” or blend.
Comprised of 43% Cabernet Sauvignon, 29% Malbec, 21% Merlot, 4% Petit Verdot, and 3% Tannat, this wine represents the very best fruit from the winery. Picked from their best, lowest yielding vineyard blocks and then sorted painstakingly down to the individual berry level, each varietal is fermented separately and then aged separately for 12 months in new French oak barrels. Only then are the best of these barrels blended to make the roughly 515 cases of this wine that are produced each year.
Full disclosure: I received this wine as a press sample.
Tasting Notes:
Dark, almost inky garnet in the glass, this wine reaches out of the glass and grabs you by the scruff of the neck, suggesting (in the politest possible way) that you immerse your head in a cloud of cassis, black cherry, and well-oiled leather aromas. And once you’ve gone that far, you have to go all the way, letting the gorgeously satiny wine flow smooth and bright across your palate, soaking it with flavors that brilliantly mirror those initial aromas — deep cassis and black cherry, tinged with an leathery earthiness. The acid balance is superb, the tannins grippy with a hint of greenness that pleases more than it perturbs, and the finish is lovely. The wine overall gives the impression of being a smooth operator.
Food Pairing:
Give me a foot and a half of grilled blood sausage and a bottle of this and I’d be set for the evening - especially if I could watch the sunset fall on the Andes.
Overall Score: 9/9.5
How Much?: $35
This wine is tough to find. Some more recent vintages areavailable for purchase on the online.
Original post by Calwineries.com Blog
We just read a great review of the “House of Mondavi: The Rise and Fall of an American Wine Dynasty” in the wine blog Vinography. The review reminded us that the author of this, Julia Flynn Siler, will be one of three featured authors at the Burlingame Library Foundation Book and Author Luncheon on Saturday, May 3, 2008 from 11:30 am to 3:00 pm. The cost is $65 per person and all proceeds benefit the Burlingame Public Library.
We live in Burlingame so you can easily understand why this event is of great interest to us. We get double pleasure out of attending this event. It helps our library and we get to hear Julia Flynn Siler talk about ‘The House of Mondavi,” a book that we thoroughly enjoyed reading. Having started our wine enjoyment adventures in the mid 1960’s, the book brought back many memories and experiences of the early days of the Napa Valley. We often wonder what the Napa Valley would be like today without the influence and pioneering of Robert Mondavi.
If you would like to attend this event, you can order your tickets online from the
Burlingame Library Foundation.

Original post by joe
We just read a great review of the “House of Mondavi: The Rise and Fall of an American Wine Dynasty” in the wine blog Vinography. The review reminded us that the author of this, Julia Flynn Siler, will be one of three featured authors at the Burlingame Library Foundation Book and Author Luncheon on Saturday, May 3, 2008 from 11:30 am to 3:00 pm. The cost is $65 per person and all proceeds benefit the Burlingame Public Library.
We live in Burlingame so you can easily understand why this event is of great interest to us. We get double pleasure out of attending this event. It helps our library and we get to hear Julia Flynn Siler talk about ‘The House of Mondavi,” a book that we thoroughly enjoyed reading. Having started our wine enjoyment adventures in the mid 1960

Those of us who are regularly looking for evidence that the online world of wine is able to reach into the physical or non digitized world of wine need examples to that effect. We have a new one.
Gary Vaynerchuk of Wine Library TV has been published…ON PAPER.
The publisher is Rodale and the book, “Gary Vaynerchuk′s 101 Wines: Guaranteed to Inspire, Delight, and Bring Thunder to Your World“, I schedule for release on May 13. This is good news for the online wine publishers such as bloggers because it helps legitimize this medium and it gives other publishers a little more confidence in looking into our world for other voice that might deserve a wider audience.
Gary is not the first blogger to see his work published. Tyler Colman (AKA Dr. Vino) will see published later this year, “Wine Politics: How Governments, Environmentalists, Mobsters, and Critics Influence the Wines We Drink” and “A Year of Wine: Perfect Pairings, Great Buys and What to Sip for Each Season.”
I can’t stress how important this kind of move from the blogging world to the world of print is for the rest of us who blog and who believe that being settled in the blogosphere means living with the appearance that our work is less credible. Despite the explosion of blogs and their impact on consumers, politics and our information intake, ink on paper still represents something more credible…even more important.
I can almost guarantee that there will be more such moves. But it will come slowly. Nonetheless it will happen that writers once tied to their wine blogs will find themselves published on paper.
The best new talent in the wine writing genre today exists in the blogosphere.
Original post by Tom Wark
Discover fine wines at the fantastic Temecula Wineries. Read reviews of the best temecula accommodations and best romantic restaurant. Learn about Temecula wineries and access links to each.
Original post by Tom Wark

Being on the inside with the members of PS I Love You (as the founder and director since its inception in 2002), I get to work with amazing people. This includes Jeff Cohn of JC Cellars, as well as Denis Sutro of Carver Sutro, in this picture that I took of them this past February.
Little confessional here…
When PS I Love You had our Dark & Delicious event in San Francisco, and I was assigning table locations, I placed Carver Sutro at the end of a row, in the back of the reception area of the Palace of Fine Arts, and in a corner location. This was very strategic. I knew that Carver Sutro was going to be an event darling, and it didn’t matter where I’d put Denis and his wife Barbara, they were going to be much sought after. So, I needed to put them in good Fung shui, and all would be well.
When Denis and Barbara arrived, he mentioned that the lighting in that corner wasn’t the best. He was right. WE had been playing with it all afternoon, and it wasn’t quite right yet.
I ran to get the house lights turned up four notches. I didn’t want them to be unhappy in any way, shape, or form, because it would appear - at first - that they might have a challenging location. I trusted that it was a great spot, but they had no reason to trust me. It was their first event with us.
So, with lights up, and Carver Sutro shining brightly, the night was a smashing success… But, about three quarters before the event was over Denis - when I checked in with Denis and Barbara - Denis told me, “I’ve run out of wine! I don’t run out of wine at these events. If I do, I’m so embarrassed. I can’t believer how many people wanted our wine!”

Well, I wasn’t surprised, knowing my group and how consumers respond to the members’ wines. With a shining star like Carver Sutro, what’s not to PS I Love You? He promised, like Markham the year before, that he’d bring twice as much in the future… Success as I knew it would be. I just got Denis’ updated info on a new release. It’s so tempting and his images are so gorgeous, that I’ve asked if I could pass it along to you. Here you go!

What to Expect from Carver Sutro Petite Sirah in 2008
Consistency is the overriding characteristic of the 9 vintages we have produced from Palisades Vineyard. Blueberries and blackberries, violets and crushed black pepper, rich, round and sweet tannins, voluptuous mouth-feel, majestic purple color and a long, dreamy finish.
Latest off the Line: 2005 Vintage
This lovely wine is available now. Bottled in August of 2007, this wine came through one of the wettest growing seasons in memory. 25 inches of rain in the spring of that harvest year was almost 300% of normal, which led to happy dry-farmed vines in early Fall when the 15 foot deep roots were still finding moisture to help them ripen the fruit. Following are Robert Parker
I spend most of my day not with people, but with words. Working as a publicist I use them constantly in the enormous amount of writing I do. Add to that my blogging (and now my occasional Twittering) and you realize that for me the search for just the right word is often the task in front of me.
More often than not I′m searching or word related to wine and drinking. There are words related to these categories, however, that I can’t recall ever using. And yet, I like these words for one reason or another. Maybe it’s the way they sound. Maybe its their specificity. I don’t know.
But here are the
10 Words I’m Trying To Find A Way To Use in a Press Release Or Another Professional Capacity
1. TIPPLE
Review by W. Blake Gray.
Carlo Rossi was a real person: a relative of Ernest and Julio Gallo. In the 1970s, the Gallos launched a new jug wine and decided “Carlo Rossi” (though he actually went by “Charlie.”) had the right ring to it. Now he’s famous and synonymous with cheap wine. This is not a bad thing: songs and even a band have been named after him. And people who buy Carlo Rossi wine do not turn up their noses at it — it’s bringing pleasure into their lives.
It seems that Robert Mondavi may be headed down the same path of immortality on a pedestal made of low-budget wine.
As recently as the mid-1990s, the name Robert Mondavi stood for quality and extravagance. It represented spare-no-expense winemaking and a corporate culture that respected pleasure as a worthwhile goal.
But now, the most commonly encountered wines with Robert Mondavi’s name on the label are the Private Selection line, generically produced wines found in drugstores and low-rent bodegas on several continents. Robert Mondavi — the first living inductee to the Vintners’ Hall of Fame, and the most important Napa County resident of the 20th century — is becoming Carlo Rossi in his own lifetime.
How did this happen? With stellar reporting and clear, enjoyable writing Julia Flynn Siler of the Wall Street Journal describes the long rise and sharp descent of California’s most iconic vintner in The House of Mondavi: The Rise and Fall of an American Wine Dynasty.
Siler took a long leave of absence to work on this book, and her research is simply outstanding. She captures the scope of Mondavi’s story, which amounts to King Lear in wine country.
Siler particularly excels at bringing back to life Robert’s parents, Cesare and Rosa. Reading the book, you can feel Cesare’s firm handshake, and you can smell the pasta sauce bubbling in Rosa’s kitchen. But you can equally feel the sadness when, over disagreements about how to run the family winery, Robert is essentially kicked out of the family.
For people of my generation the most memorable Mondavi family tragedy occurred in 2004, when the company’s board of directors forced the sale of the winery to Constellation Brands, eliminating the family’s connection altogether. Robert Mondavi spent his entire life trying to build an inheritable estate on par with the great chateaus of France, but now the family doesn’t even own his name.
But the true Mondavi family tragedy happened in the 1960s, and Siler captures both the details of the events and their deep emotional impact. Robert and his younger brother Peter had long fought over the direction of Charles Krug winery, which Robert had urged their father to buy. After their protracted conflict came to blows, Robert was banished from the company. Eventually he sued his own family and won, forcing Charles Krug into difficult financial times that took Peter’s side of the family 25 years to recover from.
Siler nicely evokes the personal details of the family squabble, like the tensions in Rosa’s kitchen. Being from the Journal, she also understands the financial aspects of the feud, explaining the resulting trial in interesting detail.
The book is at its strongest detailing first the Mondavi family’s rise, and then Robert’s rise to prominence on his own from the 1960s through the 1980s. Perhaps those are the years and events on which all of Siler’s sources are most in agreement.
The story starts to get a little messy — as it did in real life — as Robert’s sons, Michael and Timothy, tragically repeat their family’s historic mistake by fighting over the direction of Robert Mondavi Winery. Their respective philosophies can be summarized as follows: Michael cared more about business, while Timothy cared more about making great wine.
Timothy’s supporters can make a very good case that the decline in quality of the company’s wines sunk the business, while Michael’s supporters can argue that Timothy was never realistic enough about the demands of a company the size of Robert Mondavi Winery. They’re both right, and both spoke to Siler, and she offers both sides’ interpretations of the events. It’s true history, but you know the old saw about “the winners write the history” - in this feud there was no winner, so the story isn’t easy to tell.
When it comes to the decline of the Mondavi empire, my only real complaint with this book involves Siler’s disdainful frowns at anything she perceives as luxurious.
Siler documents plenty of cases where the Mondavis spent profligately. They were certainly indulgent when economic times were good. But some of the things she scowls at sound like legitimate business expenses in the wine industry. Consider this passage (page 273, hardback edition): “With Mondavi’s long record of success, a culture of entitlement had set in. Two-hour lunches where employees lingered over a $50 bottle of wine were not unusual.”
People in the business of making, buying, selling (or writing about) wine have to drink $50 bottles — you simply have to know what they taste like. And two hours is a little long for lunch, but hardly worthy of notice in the food and wine industry.
Later in the same paragraph she writes, “instead of staying at budget motels, where staffers from Gallo stayed, Mondavi employees stayed at the Hilton in La Jolla and other four- or five-star spots.” At the time Mondavi was selling itself as a premium wine company, while Gallo’s fortunes were built on jug wines. I don’t know where winemakers visiting from France stay in La Jolla, but I’ll bet it ain’t Motel 6.
Siler implies that somehow these two-hour lunches, or free bottles of wine to employees, or people knocking off at 4 p.m. on Fridays, helped to sink the company. She also delves into great detail on some of the large, indisputably disastrous business decisions that cost Mondavi dearly, including a money-sink Chilean winery and an expensive deal to promote fine wine at Disneyland through a restaurant where the best-selling wine turned out to be White Zinfandel.
The book also details the large charitable commitments that Robert made, which irritated his sons because they saw that money as coming right out of their inheritances. Had Robert not made those promised donations when money got tight, the outcome might have been different. But Robert Mondavi would not be the great man that he is if he walked away from charitable commitments. By preserving one kind of legacy, he partially ensured the end of a different one.
A lesser complaint I have with the book is that while Siler clearly has a great many sources throughout the majority of the book, it’s pretty clear who her main source is on the forced sale of the company. Ted Hall came in from outside and made millions of dollars in a few months while executing a deal that ousted all of the Mondavi family members from the winery, yet he somehow comes across as a white knight in what was far from a clear cut situation.
I love that Siler lists her sources for various information: it gives her well-deserved credibility. It’s also useful here: Flip to the notes in the back for the chapter entitled “The Takeover″ and you see that she gets her info mainly from Hall and Michael Mondavi, who was extremely embittered by this point in the family saga. She also uses material from Robert’s wife Margrit Biever Mondavi but doesn’t seem to trust her more than Hall. On a very minor point, the idea that Hall tried to cheer up Robert and Margrit after the sale by telling them they could travel more, Siler feels the need to write in the notes, “Ted Hall does not recall making this comment regarding flying first class or taking cruises, but Margrit Biever Mondavi recorded it in her diary entry for that day.”
These are nitpicks, however. Perhaps a larger issue worth speculating about might be this book′s place in history.
In 1993, Ellen Hawkes wrote an interesting book about the also-quarrelsome Gallo family entitled “Blood & Wine.” The book has faded somewhat from public consciousness even though the Gallos have not.
Many, many people’s lives in California’s Wine Country were touched by the Mondavis. I suspect every one of them who wants to read this book has already done so. In 15 years, will people still be interested in the tragic King Lear-like tale of a Carlo Rossi-like figure?
Put it this way: would you read a book called “The House of Rossi: His Meteoric Rise, Tragic Family Feuds and Sad Ending”? And how sad is the ending, really?
Timothy and Michael Mondavi may not have inherited an estate winery, but they’re not exactly poor. Robert and his brother Peter have finally made up, though resentment still simmers among some of the cousins.
There are worse fates than being remembered as a name (and maybe in the future, a smiling face) on millions of bottles of Constellation-produced California appellation wine.
I want a happy ending for Robert Mondavi. He lived large and lived well. His tireless promotion of Napa Valley and the “wine lifestyle” that he believed anyone should be able to enjoy, made life better for many people, myself included. Writing about wine wouldn’t be nearly so much fun if our area wineries weren’t so ambitious, a quality they owe a debt of gratitude to Mondavi for pioneering.
If Robert Mondavi’s legacy amounts to a few hours of joy for thousands of penny-pinching picnickers, or even 750ml of enjoyment for supermarket wine buyers everywhere, that’s worthwhile. His life — and Siler’s chronicling of it — are interesting enough to give The House of Mondavi readers a few hours of joy as well.
Julia Flynn Siler, The House of Mondavi: The Rise and Fall of an American Wine Dynasty, Gotham 2008, $10.20 (Paperback).
W. Blake Gray is a San Francisco wine writer currently sulking over the poor wine selection this season at Oakland A’s games.
Original post by Calwineries.com Blog
Arthur, of redwinebuzz, commenting on today’s earlier post about what should be the standard for quality in wine, makes the case that a high high quality wine is that which best displays their classic traits and characteristics of the variety or combination of variety and terroir. (Correct me if I mischaracterize you Arthur. Using dog breeding as an example, he writes: "What makes a Doberman a classic example of the breed? The way it best
displays the traits and characteristics that define the breed."

It’s the perfect analogy, I think.
The Doberman, or any dog breed, is a good example of what I’m getting at when I ask WHY should one standard of wine quality be embraced over another. Over time, dog breeders have bred out or bred in certain characteristics based on an evolving standard for the breed. This implies that over time, the standard for this dog has changed. Which of the varying standards for a breed that have existed over the past 200 years is the "best" or highest quality?
I wonder if it’s possible to argue that a flabby, fruit-forward, high alcohol Cabernet is the style that should be thought of when we ask what are the criteria for high quality wine? I think clearly that all it takes for that standard to be recognized is buy-in by a combination of producers, critics and members of the trade.
To suggest that this style of Cab is not the standard by which quality should be judged, seems to me to be no more than preferring another style to this one that can also be achieved by pampering a grapevine with equal compassion.
What I’m getting at is this (and I’m not sure I like where I am): The quality standard against which Cab-based wines, Pinot Noir, Riesling or Rhone are to be judged amounts to a preference that may have no objective warrant other than "it is agreed that we like this style better than that one".
Someone can proclaim that "high quality Cabernet-based wines must have a moderate tannin structure that will provide the wine with youthful grip and structure." That’s fine. But, this statement strikes me as meaningless unless we can say WHY this should be the standard. Simply saying "This is what classic Cabernet" tastes like is really just a statement about the historical record and not WHY that style of Cabernet ought to be considered the standard.
I′m coming to the conclusion that whatever standards for quality in wine might exist, it really is just a statement of agreement among those that are educated, not a statement of anything objective.
Now, this is interesting territory, isn’t it? In the first place it means deferring to "experts" to tell us what is "quality", just as Eric Asimov suggests we should be doing. On the other hand, it provides the experts with no other justification for telling others what high quality wine looks and tastes like because it’s all about preference, which is, as far as I can tell, an entirely subjective notion.
To go back to the Dog analogy, this means if you want to gain consent that your Doberman is an excellent example of high quality dobermanship, then you need the buy-in of those who, at this moment in time, have agreed that the characteristics that your Doberman possesses are the same as their preference in Dobermans. It’s the same for wine. If you want consent that your wine possesses the characteristics of high quality wine, you need the buy-in of those that, together, have agreed that the characteristics that your wine possesses happen to be the same that they agree amount to quality.
However, the experts’ agreement that these characteristics amount to "high quality" is not based on anything objective beyond the fact that experts agree. Furthermore, a novice with a different set of criteria for "high quality" could put those criteria forward and only be honestly contradicted by the experts with the following contention: "But I like the other style better."
This is all much like the argument that atheists and theists have: What is moral and what is immoral?
The theists will argue that if we reject God’s moral code, we are simply left with "what’s right and wrong is what ever you believe is right and wrong and you have nothing but your own relativistic world view to back up your moral code." On the other hand, the theists will also argue that by pointing to God’s righteousness and his status as the creator of everything, the theists have substantial warrant or authority to say X is good and X is bad: God tells us so.
Now, while I would argue that the theists’ reliance on God’s moral code amounts to relativism of exactly the same sort that the atheist MUST admit they believe in, the theists do have something of a compelling point about having a standard for right and wrong and being able to point to an objective source for that standard: The Righteousness and Perfection of the Almighty God.
In the context of wine, the experts are God and the $2 Buck Chuck devotees are the Abyss of Relativism. The experts have a Standard. The $2 Buck Chuck Quaffers have whatever makes them feel good.
But you have to ask yourself this about the followers of God/Experts: What reasoning did they use when they decided that God/Experts were the right voice to follow?
Original post by Tom Wark
The term “sustainability” means preserving the environment and using the land in such a way as to preserve it for future generations.
Honig Vineyards & Winery is proof positive that a winery can make really good wines while at the same time preserving the planet by adopting sustainable practices. In the case of Honig Vineyards, sustainable practices include cover crops instead of chemical fertilizers, owl houses and bat houses instead of pesticides, the use of solar energy and bio diesel fuel, and much more.

We recently visited Honig Vineyards on a beautiful spring day. The winery is open by appointment only so we were expecting few visitors during a Tuesday visit. We were surprised to find the winery quite busy. It is obvious that Honig is a popular winery among tourists.
Our host gave us the choice of tasting wines in the tasting room or at the tables in their outdoor tasting area. That was an easy choice considering how pleasant a day it was. Tasting fee is $10 for a taste of five wines including their high-end Bartolucci Vineyard Cabernet. Our host poured us a taste of their Sauvignon Blanc and sat down to welcome us to Honig and chat about their philosophy of sustainable practices. Our host was very enthusiastic but not overbearing. He gave us plenty of time alone to savor each wine. Each time he returned he gave us a brief description of the wine he was pouring and answered our questions knowledgeably. We spent a very leisurely time in the sun enjoying all the delicious Honig wines. The Rutherford Sauvignon Blanc is a wonderful wine and has been one of our favorites over the years. The Bartolucci Vineyard Cabernet is an outstanding wine highly rated by various wine critics. However, at $75 a bottle, it is a just a bit out of our price range.

Before we left, we walked in the vineyards to observe the owl and hawk houses posted at the end of several of the vineyard rows. The rows between the vines had been recently tilled so that the cover crops were now mulched into the soil.
One more thing, our host, also explained that the sustainable practices concept is applied to employees. The winery provides full benefits and other workplace practices to keep employees working productively and remaining on the job.
The Good: A fine example of what can be done using sustainable practices, delicious wines.
The Bad: The Bartolucci Vineyard Cabernet is out of our price range.
Original post by joe
The term
Some great commentary on politics, religion, wine and the evil that is WalMart from WineSeeing.blogspot.com.
Wine - Seeing the World Through the Bottom of a Glass: What Would Jesus Drink?
Original post by Craig Camp
I get a lot of press releases but don’t often publish them here as I don’t usually find an angle to blog about. But a release this morning by the Center for Wine Origins and Office of Champagne caught my eye for it’s use of a YouTube video:
As a longtime wine lover, I agree with the objectives of this group in protecting their place names but I wonder if the average American consumer really would understand the group’s message. Would consumers buy less Andre or Korbel if those producers were forced to remove the word “champagne” from their labels? Are consumers of American “sherry” or “port” really looking for the real deal from Spain or Portugal?
I doubt it.
Back when American producers were using European place names to label their wine blends there was a clear point of difference between a Napa Valley “burgundy” and Pinot Noir from the French region. Now there is less difference in the bottle outside of a handful of the finest vineyards.
So is this distinction still relevant in today’s market or is it just semantics?
Original post by Tim
"In yet another anti-intellectual effort to take fancy-schmancy wine
down a peg or two, a new book purports to demonstrate that price bears
little relation to quality and that the experts don

Dear Diary,
This past week, I didn

Dear Diary,
This past week, I didn
There have been major rants and counter-rants (their words not mine) lately about high alcohol wines by Alder Yarrow at Vinography and Thor Iverson at oenoLogic, there’s lots of good thinking, interesting reading and great debate in these two posts. However, I think they miss the major point on this issue.
Nobody who has tasted a lot of wine can deny that they′ve tasted many wines with high alcohol that worked. Wines that despite their potent alcohol were balanced, interesting to drink, complex and great with food. There is also the reality that not all varieties are created equal when it comes to gracefully carrying high alcohol levels. For example the elegant pinot noir is often overwhelmed by alcohol levels that zinfandel and syrah lightly carry.
The issue should not be the alcohol level of the wine, but if the wine tastes balanced and still reflects the 3 V’s of great wine: variety, vineyard and vintage. It is here that higher alcohol wines often fail, but the reason is not the alcohol level itself.
The faults often blamed on high alcohol come not from alcohol itself, but the fact that the grapes were harvested super-ripe, which is just another word for overripe. These overripe grapes, which are the fashion as one of the routes to pointy wines, obliterate the three V’s as varietal character disappears as does the personalities of vineyard and vintage. A byproduct of these overripe grapes is high alcohol, which is created by combining exaggerated sugar levels with super-efficient cultured yeasts that can keep eating sugar and excreting more alcohol no matter the alcohol level in the fermenter. In the old days all the yeasts would have died, but today’s macho yeasts can handle 16%+ with no problem. The result of all this is a wine with huge fruit flavors of indeterminate origin, 4.0 pH, 15% alcohol and 90+ points. Of course, it has only a generic personality as it could come from anywhere as can easily be seen in wines from Spain, Australia and California that are totally interchangeable and indistinguishable. After all, what is an appropriate alcohol level for a stateless wine with no varietal character?
The first issue should be if the wine has any personality at all before we get to the alcohol level. Once that issue has been resolved we can think about wether the alcohol level is appropriate. Appropriate alcohol levels also should vary by vintage and a winemaker that makes natural wines will have alcohol levels that change year-to-year. My experience is that even in hotter vintages that produce higher alcohol levels well made wines will achieve a balance that works, although it may take some time to attain equilibrium. No, wines from a hot vintage may not be the best a producer makes, but they can be excellent wines. The key issue for the winemaker is to harvest ripe, but not overripe grapes each year if they wish to produce distinctive wines. Ripe grapes produce wines with alcohol levels that will find a natural balance in the wine of that year, but wines from overripe grapes produce not only out of balance alcohol levels, but cannot achieve any kind of natural balance as every aspect of the wine becomes distorted and exaggerated.
It’s overripe grapes, not demon alcohol, that are the villains in this debate.
Original post by Craig Camp
While Gary Vaynerchuk of Wine Library TV may seem a bit frenetic on stage/screen, his personal responses to recent criticisms have not been and are to be commended. His responses to criticism here and on PinotBlogger have been polite, thoughtful and even humble. His reaction to criticism has been just the opposite of Robert Parker’s tirades. This type of real communication can only make wine criticism and the information available to consumers more diverse and inclusive.
I have criticized Gary for giving wine points (no big deal as I criticize all critics for that) and a generalization, but I repeat a point that I have made many times that Gary is to be complimented for his passion and ability to bring wine to new consumers in a way that entertains rather than intimidates. Let’s all hope that this conversation not only continues, but grows.
Technorati Tags: Wine,Wine Library TV,Vaynerchuk
Original post by Craig Camp
As wine lovers, we all belong to a club whose entrance criteria include passion and romanticism. We return to wine again and again for its magical ability to transcend what is in the glass, and to transport us in memory and experience to both favorite and new places.
By far the most pleasurable and rewarding relationship with wine involves an affair of just these sorts of passions, blissfully ignorant of the facts which demand that wine also be understood in terms of economics, politics, and science.
Many of us are content to live in a world where there is no dichotomy between wine our treasured sustenance, and wine the commercial product. But just like a relationship that consists of only physical passion, such an understanding of wine ignores the complexity of the world, and ultimately produces an ignorance that is self defeating.
Unfortunately, I know far too many wine lovers who simply refuse to acknowledge that wine is a business first, and an art (or more accurately, a craft) only when those who practice it can actually feed their families.
Evidence of wines fundamentally commercial nature is hard to come by, especially for those who would rather pretend that winemaking exists independently of the pressures and demands of economic trends and market forces.
Which is why I was thrilled last month when Champagne (or more accurately, the INAO governing body that regulates France’s appellation system) announced that they were planning to significantly increase the size of the Champagne appellation in order to be able to produce more wine and keep up with consumer demand.
Yes, that’s right. The sacred, inviolable designation of what IS Champagne, and what IS NOT; the demarcations and boundaries of one of the world’s greatest terroirs; the place that is synonymous with the wine that it produces — is going to be adjusted because there are just not enough “approved″ vineyards to make the amount of wine that producers think they can sell.
I can’t tell you how many arguments I’ve gotten into with people who act like the definition of French appellations, their boundaries, and their associated rules of production, are all based upon some ancient historical truth whose wisdom should not be questioned. Such folks, if given the opportunity, would presumably laud the INAO as the just protectors of these ancient traditions and the saviors of the authenticity of French wine in the face of global pressures to compete.
Alas, the world is a bit more complicated than that, as the folks who are determining the future of Champagne demonstrate. Wine is a business, and that is as true for the small farmers growing wheat outside of Reims who will soon be able to plant the much more lucrative crop of Pinot Noir and improve their standard of living, as well as the large Champagne houses who will be able to make a few million more bottles to slake the thirst of us wine lovers.
Like my wine, I prefer reality with complexity.
Original post by Calwineries.com Blog
Seven years ago, I didn’t really know anything about Riesling. Seriously. Most of the Rieslings I had tasted at the point were purchased in supermarkets. Which meant that they were all from California or Washington, and that almost without exception, they sucked.
I had yet to begin exploring the wines of Germany and Austria (I would shudder at the thought of decoding those inscrutable five-syllable names) and when it came to the wines of Alsace, I tended to pass over Riesling in favor of Gewurztraminer and Pinot Blanc. I had probably tasted one or two Rieslings from the Clare Valley in Australia, but as far as I was concerned, the entire grape variety was uncharted territory.
At a certain point, however, I got serious about filling in the major gaps in my wine knowledge and experience, and dove headfirst into Riesling, tasting hundreds of German and Austrian wines per year. I’ve kept that up ever since, and have come to love Rieslings, especially old ones, for their gorgeous, stony zest and brightness that is unique in the world of wine. I tend to prefer drier Rieslings — up to about the level of Spatlese — which makes some of my Riesling fanatic friends snigger over their Auslese, but despite my aversion for the super sweet, I pretty much think that German and Austrian Riesling kicks ass.
This month’s Wine Blogging Wednesday event, the 45th in our series, is hosted by my friend Tim Elliot who runs Winecast.Net. He’s selected Old World Riesling as the the theme for the tasting. This means Riesling from Germany, Austria, and France, primarily, although if you can find some from Northern Italy or elsewhere in Eastern Europe, more power to ya.
If you’re not familiar with Wine Blogging Wednesday, it’s the Blogosphere’s virtual wine tasting event, where bloggers all over the world taste wine based on a theme, and then post their reviews on a designated Wednesday. For WBW#45, bloggers all over the world will be drinking and reviewing Old World Riesling on May 7th. Even if you don’t have a blog, you can participate by posting your review at www.winebloggingwednesday.org.
See you on May 7th, and may the Trockenberenauslese be with you.
Original post by Calwineries.com Blog
Best of the wine blogosphere for April 7th through April 11th:
Wire and Posts
“This is a recent image from a trip to Sonoma. I’m always attracted to the trees in the vineyards, and their relationships to the vines. At this time of year they both take on a sculptural aspect with bare branches against the sky, at times criscrossed by the threads of exposed trellis wire.” — Michael Regnier
INSTRUCTIONS:
Download this image by right-clicking (Mac users, click and hold) on the image and selecting “save link as” or “save target as” and then select the desired location on your computer to save the image. Mac users can also just click the image and drag it to your desktop.
To set the image as your desktop wallpaper, Mac users should follow these instructions, while PC users should follow these.
PRINTS:
If you are interested in owning an archive quality print of this image, or any of the other vineyard images featured here on Vinography, you can purchase one on the Michael Regnier Photography web site for $85.
ABOUT VINOGRAPHY IMAGES:
Vinography regularly features images by photographer Michael Regnier for readers′ personal use as desktop backgrounds or screen savers. We hope you enjoy them. Please respect the copyright on these images.
Original post by Calwineries.com Blog
In the long and storied history of Wine Blogging Wednesday, several bloggers have hosted the monthly virtual tasting twice. But only one, founder Lenn Thompson of LENNDEVOURS, has hosted three times. As of today, you can add my name to the WBW three-peat list as I again take up the reins and choose the theme.
The previous two times I’ve hosted, red wines were featured: first lite in alcohol, then full-tilt in the other direction. So this time out, I’ll pick my favorite white variety, Riesling. But not Riesling grown just anywhere, but where the grape first achieved noble status in the Old World: Germany, Austria and France’s Alsace region. In this terroir, the variety produces some of the most interesting and long-lived white wines from bone-dry to lusciously sweet.
Pick any style you like, at any price point, and join me as we explore Old World Riesling on Wednesday, May 7.
To participate, just pick up a wine made from Riesling grown in Germany, Austria or Alsace (OK, Northern Italy, the Czech Republic and Slovenia are also fine) and blog about it. If you don’t have a blog, sign-up and post at the WBW Community Blog. Once you have posted, send me an email at winecast (at) gmail (dot) com with “WBW 45″ in your subject line. Sometime after May 7th, I’ll post an event round-up here.
I hope you enjoy this theme as much as me and pick up a bottle from somewhere you have not tried yet. I think you will be very pleased with the resulting value.
Original post by Tim
In some ways, if Mark Neal and his small winery, Neal Family Vineyards, didn’t make fantastic wines, it would be cause for extreme concern. Neal has been working in the vineyards since the age of eight, and his family business, which was responsible for his early employment among the vines, has been managing many of Napa’s finest vineyards for more than four decades. At this point, Jack Neal and Sons, which still carries the name of Mark’s father, who passed away in 1994, is the single largest vineyard management company in Napa according to Neal. They manage well over 2000 acres of vineyards for more than 60 growers and more than 70 wineries.
With so much prime Napa land under his direct control, and relationships with so many of the top producers and winemakers in Napa, if Neal Family Vineyards didn′t make great wine, they would have some serious
explaining to do. Instead, Neal simply has purchased or contracted several vineyards around the valley over the past 30 years, and quietly makes small quantities of fantastic wine.
Mark Neal grew up in Rutherford, in the heart of the Napa Valley. When he wasn’t at school, he was on a tractor with his dad out in what were, at the time, a combination of prune and walnut orchards. Farming was the family business, to the point that when things needed to get done around the farm, every pair of able hands had to pitch in, including Mark. He fondly recalls his frequent breaks from school to work in the orchards.
“My mother was full Greek, and she was the one who would write the notes to get me out of school to work with the family,” he says with a wry smile. “My teachers used to be amazed at just how many Greek holidays there were each year.”
Calling the Neal family entrepreneurial might almost understate the case. Jack Neal realized early on that there was more future in growing wine grapes in the valley than in fruits and nuts. Neal moved into vineyard management before there were many people offering such services in the valley. With his wife managing the books, and his son at his side, Neal built an extremely successful vineyard management company that has grown and diversified over the years to include a vineyard development and construction company, a vineyard information systems and GIS systems company, and a bulk wine trucking company, all of which Mark Neal continues to manage on a daily basis, employing nearly 300 people.
The vineyard management company continues to be the pride of the Neal Family, and rightly so. Jack Neal and Sons currently manages the largest amount of Certified Organic vineyards of any vineyard management company in the state, some of which are widely acknowledged to be among Napa’s best vineyards.
“We started growing organic in 1984 for some clients, and at the time, I had no idea how we were going to do it. There weren’t very many [organic] materials available to us to use. Those few that were available were expensive, ineffective, or both.” Now, a full 90% of the vineyards that Neal farms are Certified Organic, with an increasing number moving towards biodynamic cultivation.
“We were also one of the first vineyard management companies to begin picking at night, starting in about ‘86″ says Neal, explaining his and his father’s self-education through trial and error in their attempts to help their clients make some of the best wine possible in Napa.
The one thing that Jack Neal never did, though, for all his knowledge and connections, was to make a wine under the family name before he passed away in 1994. He talked about it often with his son, and planted the seeds of a dream that Mark realized in 1998, adding yet one more business under the family banner, both in tribute to his father and as something that he could leave as a legacy to his own children.
At the moment, the Howell Mountain winery seems more like a playground for his kids, who, like their father in his youth, seem to have an endless amount of fun driving tractors around to cut the cover crops or disc the vine rows. The front of the (gorgeous) winery is beautifully landscaped with several species of dogwood trees and a pond filled with ornamental Coi (all designed and laid out fastidiously by Neal), but is also likely to be populated with several small bikes, the family’s two gregarious white German Shepherds, and most certainly one of Neal’s five children.
“Maybe they′ll want to be involved, maybe not,” says Neal, “but it will be an option if they′re not interested in construction or trucking.”
For now, it remains an intensely personal project for Neal, but one which he approaches with the seriousness that has made the rest of his businesses so successful.
Neal never actually ever uttered the phrase “if it’s worth doing, it’s worth doing right” in my presence, but he didn’t need to. It’s written all over everything at the winery, from the the building, with its inventive and beautiful wrought copper detailing, to the way the wine is made by winemaker Gove Cielo and assistant winemaker and enologist Kelly Wheat.
As one might imagine, the grapes are hand picked with extreme care, almost always at night. They are sorted rigorously and destemmed, and then given a long cold soak before a long slow fermentation with wild yeasts begins. Since the winery operates well below capacity, the wines are left to finish fermenting as long as they take in the vats, in separate lots for each vineyard block. Only the free-run juice (the juice which can be drained off the fermenting grapes without pressing) is used for the estate’s wines, and the press juice is sold off in bulk. The wine is aged in 80% new French oak (100% new for single vineyard wines) along with some Hungarian oak.
As the wines age, Neal and his two winemakers taste and grade every barrel independently, giving each A, B, and C ratings. Any barrel that gets three A’s becomes a single vineyard designate, and any barrel that gets even one C gets sold off as bulk wine. The reds are never fined, and are only coarsely filtered before bottling. Most spend at least 18 months in oak and then another year in the bottle, though Neal has been known to hold wines back if he doesn′t feel that they are ready for release (just as he has been known to refuse release of wines at all if they are not up to his standards, as the 2000s weren′t).
Neal Family Vineyards produces about 6000 cases of wine each year, the majority of which is their Napa Valley Cabernet, which is blended from fruit grown in four vineyards in Atlas Peak, Howell Mountain, Mt. Veeder, and Rutherford. In addition to this wine, the estate currently produces six single vineyard wines, made in quantities of between 140 and 240 cases, as well as even smaller amounts of Petite Sirah and Zinfandel. Recently the winery also produced a Sauvignon Blanc.
Neal Family Wines are marked by a brightness and a balance that immediately made me take notice when I first tasted them at a Family Winemakers tasting several years ago. I also couldn’t help noticing the prices of the wines, which Neal hasn’t changed since the first vintage.
If you are able to get your hands on a bottle, these wines are deeply satisfying and deftly represent everything that is good about Napa Cabernet.
TASTING NOTES:
Click on wines to purchase.
2005 Neal Family Vineyards Cabernet Sauvignon, Napa Valley
Medium to dark garnet in color, this wine has a beautifully lean nose of espresso, tobacco, and dark chocolate aromas. In the mouth the wine is beautifully balanced between juicy, bright cherry and plum fruit and the lightly bitter cocoa powder and pungent espresso notes that emerge as the fine tannins cling to the tongue. The wine finishes beautifully — long drawn out notes of chocolate covered cherries that sing a plaintive song: “just one more sip….” Score: around 9.5. Cost: $45.
2004 Neal Family Vineyards Petite Sirah, Napa Valley
Medium purple in color, this wine smells smoky, leathery, and just a tiny bit funky (in a good way). In the mouth it is incredibly clear and bright with cassis and blueberry notes stretched between a hint of green stems and well oiled leather. Remarkably, the wine is only medium bodied and has fine, almost soft tannins that are far from the typical bruising grip that this varietal exhibits. Moderate finish. Score: between 9 and 9.5. Cost: $35.
2006 Neal Family Vineyards Zinfandel, Napa Valley
Medium garnet in color, this wine has a surprisingly chocolate nose, coupled with aromas of rich berries. In the mouth, chocolate continues to be the predominant theme, with some plump blueberries emerging at times amidst the silky palate. Frankly, this Zinfandel has a lot of Cabernet qualities, which are not so much unpleasant as they are unexpected. Score: between 8.5 and 9. Cost: $24.
2004 Neal Family Vineyards “Wykoff Vineyard″ Cabernet Sauvignon, Rutherford, Napa Valley
Medium to dark garnet in the glass, this wine has a gorgeously perfumed, sweet nose of cherry fruit and floral scents that have the purity of a cloudless day. In the mouth, the wine is beautifully dry and the sweetness of the nose resolves into nicely balanced and smooth textured flavors of bla